Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 01:37:22 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org> To: pav@FreeBSD.org Cc: glarkin@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org, "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Dislike the way port conflicts are handled now Message-ID: <20100117013722.1893895c@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <1263673588.1541.60.camel@hood.oook.cz> References: <d873d5be1001161001i5d398205hea3d2ec1978ee3f@mail.gmail.com> <4B520C71.9080301@FreeBSD.org> <1263673588.1541.60.camel@hood.oook.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/RlO=6AwUMR2Vt5bhdtazGSj
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 21:26:28 +0100
Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> Greg Larkin p=C3=AD=C5=A1e v so 16. 01. 2010 v 13:58 -0500:
>=20
> > That's exactly what I proposed. The bsd.port.mk could be patched to
> > support a new variable ("EARLY_CONFLICT_CHECK=3Dyes" or somesuch) that
> > shifts the check-conflict target from its old position (part of the
> > install sequence) to its new position (fetch?).
> >=20
> > The default behavior (no mods to /etc/make.conf) would revert to
> > the old conflict checking method. This may be something for
> > portmgr@ to chime in on, and I'm cc'ing them now. There could be
> > other reasons for this change that I'm unaware of.
>=20
> What is the particular scenario that the new conflicts handling broke
> for you? Often you really want to ignore locally installed packages
> and then it's better to override LOCALBASE to /nonex or something
> similar, instead of disabling conflict handling...
I'd be very happy if I could:
- fetch the distfiles, even if I have a conflicting port installed
- be able to use portmaster -o to switch from one port to an other one
that conflicts with it.
- be able to at least compile a port (eg. for testing) without having
to de-install the current one.
I'm all in favor of restoring the old behavior with a switch available
to turn on the new one.
--=20
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
"Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
--Sig_/RlO=6AwUMR2Vt5bhdtazGSj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAktSTb4ACgkQJ7GIuiH/oeXTwQCgsPFZP7TIuNVY8V2dOCHJa70l
2HQAoKsCi8hS7JutGTl5qdQYv28ekjqb
=FNi8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Sig_/RlO=6AwUMR2Vt5bhdtazGSj--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100117013722.1893895c>