Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:25:55 -0800 From: Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ionice in FreeBSD? Message-ID: <20100205172555.GA9144@icarus.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <20100205170622.GA24658@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> References: <4B685EBA.4020501@minibofh.org> <4B695A1A.1000505@incunabulum.net> <4B696360.3070209@minibofh.org> <4B6ACC38.2030708@incunabulum.net> <20100204142045.GA86101@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <4B6BFBF8.8050302@minibofh.org> <20100205170622.GA24658@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 06:06:22PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 12:07:36PM +0100, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote: > > Great work Luigi ;) > > That's amazing... anyway ?is it production-ready? > > i would say it is pretty solid. I used it on my main workstation > and desktop for a few months last year without a glitch. I appreciate your work on this -- truly I do -- but the above statement is incredible. This is not meant as a flame-inducer, but there's really no other way to phrase it: This IS NOT what "production-ready" means to the rest of us, particularly those of us in the server world. A single developer running such code on their workstation for a few months is in no way identical to that of a heavily I/O-bound server. I thought freebsd.org (or maybe ISC?) offered some test/development boxes on the 'net available to developers who could test such code + perform stress tests over long periods of time? I'm probably mistaken, but I was under that impression. -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc@parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100205172555.GA9144>