Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 13:41:17 +0100 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely7.cicely.de> To: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, Mark Tinguely <tinguely@casselton.net>, ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: Performance of SheevaPlug on 8-stable Message-ID: <20100308124117.GW11192@cicely7.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <201003081007.14326.hselasky@c2i.net> References: <20100308021642.GQ11192@cicely7.cicely.de> <201003080300.o28303CD011298@casselton.net> <be2f52431003080025s3d95560dg359501a3ba256048@mail.gmail.com> <201003081007.14326.hselasky@c2i.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 10:07:14AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Monday 08 March 2010 09:25:59 Jacques Fourie wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 5:00 AM, Mark Tinguely <tinguely@casselton.net> > wrote: > > > <deletes> > > > > > >> It is still puzzling me why it is not near 80 seconds. > > >> This would mean it is loosing something about 5-6 cycles. > > >> Well - Ok - the pipeline might be that long and real loops are > > >> mostly some instructions longer. > > >> But I would still be interested to see Linux results on RM9200. > > >> > > >> -- > > >> B.Walter <bernd@bwct.de> http://www.bwct.de > > >> Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm. > > > > > > Thinking way out of the box ... has anyone tried this in single user > > > mode? > > > > > Was the output from "vmstat -i" and "top" posted? No, but I can say that my current and 8.0-current system had almost no load. My 7.0-current system had about 60-70% load and was about 3 times slower than the 8.0 and the patched 9.0 system, so it makes sense. Do you expect anything special to see? -- B.Walter <bernd@bwct.de> http://www.bwct.de Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100308124117.GW11192>