Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 18:32:22 +0000 From: Shaun Amott <shaun@FreeBSD.org> To: Steven Kreuzer <skreuzer@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports with same name Message-ID: <20100309183221.GA90364@charon.picobyte.net> In-Reply-To: <47B3280E-2609-476D-92EA-BC940C8C49D3@freebsd.org> References: <47B3280E-2609-476D-92EA-BC940C8C49D3@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 10:23:51AM -0500, Steven Kreuzer wrote: > As documented in http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/144277 > we have two ports with the same name: > > Port: gag-2.9 > Path: /usr/ports/security/gag > Info: A stacheldraht (DOS attack) agent detector [...] > Port: gag-4.9 > Path: /usr/ports/sysutils/gag > Info: Graphical Boot Manager [...] > I am looking for some advice on whats the best course of action to deal with this. > > My gut feeling is that sysutils/gag should remain the same and that security/gag should be > renamed to security/gag-stacheldraht. > > Anyone vehemently opposed to this? The new name sounds reasonable, but it would probably make sense just to change LATEST_LINK rather than "move" the port. -- Shaun Amott // PGP: 0x6B387A9A "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds." - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100309183221.GA90364>