Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 19:25:14 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn <gary.jennejohn@freenet.de> To: Steven Kreuzer <skreuzer@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports with same name Message-ID: <20100309192514.49a88a53@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <47B3280E-2609-476D-92EA-BC940C8C49D3@freebsd.org> References: <47B3280E-2609-476D-92EA-BC940C8C49D3@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:23:51 -0500 Steven Kreuzer <skreuzer@freebsd.org> wrote: > Hello- > > As documented in http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/144277 > we have two ports with the same name: > > Port: gag-2.9 > Path: /usr/ports/security/gag > Info: A stacheldraht (DOS attack) agent detector > Maint: ports@FreeBSD.org > B-deps: > R-deps: > WWW: http://www.washington.edu/People/dad/ > > Port: gag-4.9 > Path: /usr/ports/sysutils/gag > Info: Graphical Boot Manager > Maint: alepulver@FreeBSD.org > B-deps: > R-deps: > WWW: http://gag.sourceforge.net/ > > I am looking for some advice on whats the best course of action to deal with this. > > My gut feeling is that sysutils/gag should remain the same and that security/gag should be > renamed to security/gag-stacheldraht. > > Anyone vehemently opposed to this? > So where's the problem? sysutils/gag doesn't seem to install a binary which would conflict with security/gag. In fact, it doesn't seem to install an executable at all, based on examining the Makefile and pkg-plist. --- Gary Jennejohn
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100309192514.49a88a53>