Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 23:17:20 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> Cc: FreeBSD Arch <arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Request for review: build infrastructure for Clang Message-ID: <20100514201720.GR83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20100514152408.GN56080@hoeg.nl> References: <20100514152408.GN56080@hoeg.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--utew04vv9FCWZJ01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 05:24:08PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote: > Hello all, >=20 > At BSDCan there has been a general agreement that in order to make Clang > a viable replacement for GCC 4.2.1, it should be integrated into FreeBSD > HEAD and installed by default as soon as possible. Could you, please, educate us lurkers not so lucky to attend the BSDCan, what is the reasoning that leads to such conclusion ? --utew04vv9FCWZJ01 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkvtr9AACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4jbCgCghRQhyDoD7QqKOVaGUHpesyKq sFsAn2G0AJ6+KiQ3Q+HLwcLX85OVs3r2 =9AqW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --utew04vv9FCWZJ01--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100514201720.GR83316>