Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:34:33 +0200 From: Michel Talon <talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, cracauer@cons.org Subject: Re: lang/cmucl broken on amd64? Message-ID: <20100611093433.GA63854@lpthe.jussieu.fr>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Martin Cracauer wrote: > Right now I think there's a general lack of people building CMUCL > binaries, BTW. There are "recent" cmucl binaries built here: http://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/downloads/snapshots/2009/01/ for freebsd 7 and freebsd 8. I think this is for x86, not x86-64 but they should work, it is not clear for me if cmucl makes use of 64 bits anyways (maxima doesn't). Unfortunately there are not more recent snapshots for freebsd 8 and no freebsd snapshots at all since 2010. In january 2010 there is the comment: " The FreeBSD binaries I had uploaded for the snapshot were flawed: I just discovered that I accidentally built them without Unicode support. To avoid confusion, these binaries have been removed. -- Alex Goncharov, 2010-03-30 " Being a maxima user i am very attached to cmucl which works very well with maxima (faster than sbcl), and i have in the past compiled cmucl using older cmucl versions, which works quite easily. Here i am afraid that Alex Goncharov has encountered some problem, and also that Darwin, Linux and NetBSD support were considered more important ... -- Michel TALON
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100611093433.GA63854>