Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:51:16 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Cc: Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: "stray irqX" or "irqX: stray" Message-ID: <201006230951.16046.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4C21AE15.6030109@FreeBSD.org> References: <4C21AE15.6030109@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 2:47:49 am Alexander Motin wrote: > Hi. > > Now we use different format for stray irq counters names (can be better > seen at `vmstat -ia`). Considering stray is a kind of special case (I > know no other cases using additional counters for interrupt source), I > still think it can be made somewhat more unified. I think we could > change "stray irqX" format to "irqX: stray". This format IMHO better > fits into existing naming scheme of "source: driver". I actually think it is more of a feature that they don't match since they should never occur. If one does occur it should be noticeable and not "blend in" with other interrupts. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201006230951.16046.jhb>