Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:44:59 +0300
From:      Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
To:        Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
Cc:        Ian FREISLICH <ianf@clue.co.za>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: fusefs-kmod broken?
Message-ID:  <20100823134459.GF2396@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
In-Reply-To: <20100823133555.GA64651@hoeg.nl>
References:  <201008230826.49509.jhb@freebsd.org> <E1OmUBI-0000Oy-J5@clue.co.za> <E1OnWc7-0001Kv-47@clue.co.za> <20100823132551.GE2396@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20100823133555.GA64651@hoeg.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--FaWovXeSfYgRrgy1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 03:35:55PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
> * Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Which most likely means that fusesfs filled its own struct fileops
> > without properly initializing fo_truncate member.
>=20
> It's a bit misleading that cdevs automatically patch the table, while
> the fileops don't. Maybe it would be a good idea to patch finit() to
I do not understand your first sentence. Would you please elaborate ?

> check whether under INVARIATIONS all fileops are set?
>=20
> --=20
>  Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
>  WWW: http://80386.nl/



--FaWovXeSfYgRrgy1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkxye1sACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4gk7gCdHrK4S7LR/7a0qSidiM6QJYBQ
NqkAn0zHBlaS1G6WSCuU/cH2+mw1BHzm
=wEUw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--FaWovXeSfYgRrgy1--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100823134459.GF2396>