Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:46:30 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Importing the fusefs kernel module? Message-ID: <20101025214630.GO2392@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <ia4td5$mh7$2@dough.gmane.org> References: <ia4qnl$bgl$1@dough.gmane.org> <20101025211904.GM2392@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <ia4td5$mh7$2@dough.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Rh1jIF008qzNHrIf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:38:44PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 10/25/10 23:19, Kostik Belousov wrote: >=20 > >This is not going to work. The code is unmaintained. Committing it into > >the src/ just makes the pile of not working code in src/ bigger. >=20 > Yes, but on the other hand, not importing it means that the code will=20 > only decay faster. It's basically a damage control issue :) No, the fusefs it is not usable in its current state (means, causing random kernel memory corruption). Committing it causes wrong users expectation, because code does not work, and also looks like a trick to make it appears to be maintaned, which obviously will not happen. Consider this as an official objection for the import, unless somebody is going to take the maintainership. --Rh1jIF008qzNHrIf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkzF+rYACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4gPrQCfeKtCj0p4SZ8BaDr3O6Fl4sul n7gAoKI3w2aC/Sgh7NH0Xv5Y7p39JH0q =Hb0g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Rh1jIF008qzNHrIf--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101025214630.GO2392>