Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:08:01 -0800 From: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> To: uqs@spoerlein.net Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: libkvm: consumers of kvm_getprocs for non-live kernels? Message-ID: <20101111150801.33afa33b.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20101111145544.GH85693@acme.spoerlein.net> References: <20101110204152.GF85693@acme.spoerlein.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1011111315430.30414@fledge.watson.org> <20101111145544.GH85693@acme.spoerlein.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:55:45 +0100 Ulrich Sp=C3=B6rlein <uqs@spoerlein.net> mentioned: >=20 > > Stas has ongoing work on a libprocstat, you might want to give him a pi= ng.=20 > > I'm not sure if he plans to refactor some of those existing tools to us= e that=20 > > library or not, but crashdump support is a key goal of it. >=20 > Thanks for the hint, stas CC'ed and reply-to set. >=20 Yes, the idea was to refactor all base tools to use libprocstat as well. So far only procstat(8), fuser and fstat have been converted to use new functionality, = so they are able to operate both on coredumps and on the live system. We still need to commit the libprocstat itself, though. --=20 Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101111150801.33afa33b.stas>