Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 15:16:30 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> To: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@coosemans.org> Cc: Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: binutils problem? WAS [Re: static linking error: ELF binary type "0" not known. Exec format error. Binary file not executable.] Message-ID: <20101206151630.GB55368@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <201012061406.31522.tijl@coosemans.org> References: <20101129130415.GA47982@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <201012061406.31522.tijl@coosemans.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 02:06:22PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Monday 29 November 2010 14:04:16 Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > ----- Forwarded message from Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com> ----- > >> On Nov 10, 2010, at 5:32 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > >>> [ia64] > >>> ia64% file a.out > >>> a.out: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, IA-64, version 1 (SYSV), statically > >>> linked, not stripped > >>> > >>> [amd64] > >>> amd64% file a.out > >>> a.out: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (FreeBSD), > >>> statically linked, for FreeBSD 9.0 (900023), not stripped > >> > >> The branding on ia64 is wrong. The executable is not marked as being > >> a FreeBSD executable. It's declared as SYSV, whereas on amd64 it's > >> properly declared as FreeBSD. > >> > >> This is a binutils problem. > > > > Anybody here can explain better what Marcel meant > > by "binutils problem", and how to fix it? > > > > I've binutils-2.20.1_3 installed from devel/binutils. > > As a workaround you could manually brand the executable: > brandelf -f 9 a.out this works fine. many thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101206151630.GB55368>