Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:31:40 -0700 From: Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Backtick versus $() Message-ID: <20110225013140.GC14304@guilt.hydra> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimb2dbn8ufyzFharRcFTnhpSGQxcm03FFMgMRhV@mail.gmail.com> References: <20110224225425.GB13490@guilt.hydra> <20110225001301.e4f6d95f.freebsd@edvax.de> <21929_1298589484_4D66E72C_21929_309_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499BD35499F@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <AANLkTinu1KB=Lz7rsH5TiZXHr61gH8AWFP=quJ9=8iJH@mail.gmail.com> <20110224232404.GA13838@guilt.hydra> <AANLkTik0r5skC0vn0OAGX1_MQDMdsrTK3943iF_rwNzD@mail.gmail.com> <20110225002644.GA14159@guilt.hydra> <AANLkTikBAtV-Yav0oxGaGejmbSdRN4Q3XDCdtdBWBSoP@mail.gmail.com> <20110225010037.GA25929@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <AANLkTimb2dbn8ufyzFharRcFTnhpSGQxcm03FFMgMRhV@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--m51xatjYGsM+13rf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:36:53PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote: > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Chip Camden > <sterling@camdensoftware.com> wrote: > > Quoth Andres Perera on Thursday, 24 February 2011: > > > > [snip] > >> > >> no, let's start by looking at the SOURCE CODE REPOSITORY instead of > >> WIKIPEDIA you DROOLING BUFFOON > >> > > [snip] > > > >> if you disagree then you are retarded and the exchange concludes > >> > > [snip] > > > > Resorting to personal insults doesn't help make your case. =A0There is > > fertile ground for discussion here if you'd only look for it. >=20 > nor does insulting you (which is very easy) invalidate the other lines > of text That wasn't me. I could make some insulting references to failings of yours that resulted in this mistake on your part, but I really do not think that's necessary. It is much more fun to just watch you self-destruct. By the way, it may not invalidate the other lines of text, but it does rather effectively eclipse them. The other lines of text are essentially invalidated by their own lack of reasoned argumentation, anyway. >=20 > you are sidestepping, again Again, that wasn't me. >=20 > how about you admit the whole discussion is a little over your head? Still wasn't me. >=20 > specially your claim of ls-F not being tcsh (sad that i know more > about your shell than you do) Not only was it not me to whom you replied here, but I did not claim that "ls-F" is not "tcsh". Read *my* actual reply for the explanation of where you went flying off into never-never-right-land on that one. > > -- > > Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F > > http://chipsquips.com =A0| http://camdensoftware.com =A0 | http://chips= tips.com > > >=20 > btw, would you stop putting ads on your signature? it's annoying How can you take note of the content of his signature block enough to comment on it like that without noticing it's nothing like my own signature block? Mine is below. Compare, and try to remember that you look like an asshole to more than one person here. >=20 > even more so when combined with your sad display of ignorance Nope -- not me this time, either. >=20 > thanks I wonder if Sterling Camden will offer a "you're welcome" to your hostile reception. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --m51xatjYGsM+13rf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk1nBnwACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKVt2wCfXhAuRhqD4fWSXWF3/H3Aw18Q V6gAn3kXfBuJoHYABDFXkq7gte961BqV =kK2d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --m51xatjYGsM+13rf--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110225013140.GC14304>