Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 25 Feb 2011 14:42:25 +0100
From:      Marco van Tol <marco@tols.org>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 8.2/7.4-RELEASEs Announced...
Message-ID:  <20110225134225.GB19190@tolstoy.tols.org>
In-Reply-To: <86zkpkwff5.fsf@brain.hack.org>
References:  <4D66CCFF.9020903@buffalo.edu> <86zkpkwff5.fsf@brain.hack.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:56:46AM +0100, Michael Cardell Widerkrantz wrote:
> Ken Smith, 2011-02-24 22:26 (+0100):
> 
> > Just a quick note for those of you who are not subscribed to the
> > freebsd-announce mail list...
> >
> > 8.2-RELEASE and 7.4-RELEASE have been announced.  The announcement
> > messages are available here:
> >
> >   http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.2R/announce.html
> >   http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.4R/announce.html
> >
> > Enjoy.  :-)
> 
> Great news.
> 
> However, a freebsd-update from a straight binary installed 8.1-RELEASE
> gives me a dialogue to merge a lot of files in /etc/ with just the $Id$
> tag being different. That is, I get:
> 
>   The following changes, which occurred between FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE and
>   FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE have been merged into /etc/manpath.config:
>   --- current version
>   +++ new version
>   @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>   -# $FreeBSD: src/gnu/usr.bin/man/manpath/manpath.config,v 1.26.2.1.4.1
>   2010/06/14 02:09:06 kensmith Exp $
>   +# $FreeBSD: src/gnu/usr.bin/man/manpath/manpath.config,v 1.26.2.1.6.1
>   2010/12/21 17:09:25 kensmith Exp $
>    #
>    # This file is read by manpath(1) to configure the mandatory manpath,
>    # optional manpath and to map each path element to a manpath element.
>    # The format is:
>    #
>   Does this look reasonable (y/n)? 
> 
> I'm afraid this will go on for all files in /etc.
> 
> What just happened? How can I avoid it?
> 
> I had this problem before and then in my frustration just commented out
> this line in freebsd-update.conf:
> 
>   #MergeChanges /etc/ /var/named/etc/ /boot/device.hints
> 
> I got lucky that time, but is this really safe? What if, say, a new
> daemon has been installed in the upgrade and needs a new user.
> 
> Any suggestions?

Read up on the mergemaster manual for options "-F" and "-i" :-)

Marco

-- 
Micro$oft likes to discard vulnerabilities by `no standard client
would do this.'  No, and no `standard visitor' would apply a crowbar
to your patio door, either." - H. Peter Anvin in linux-kernel.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110225134225.GB19190>