Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:42:40 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Emanuel Haupt <ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: MASTER_SITE quality of emulation@, freebsd-emulation@ ports Message-ID: <20110228104240.32245ke5o34pco40@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20110228101541.1926b275.ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> References: <20110226125814.3b0a46e5.ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> <20110227145125.12961olps6d8bapw@webmail.leidinger.net> <20110228101541.1926b275.ehaupt@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Emanuel Haupt <ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> (from Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:15:41 +0100): > Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net> wrote: >> Quoting Emanuel Haupt <ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> (from Sat, 26 Feb 2011 >> 12:58:14 +0100): >> >> > The distilator [1] shows that roughly 97% by a total of109969 all >> > referenced distfiles fail to download. Resulting in countless >> > timeouts. >> > >> > Excerpt from the most recent run: >> > >> > Maintainer ok bad % bad >> > emulation@FreeBSD.org 1005 45696 97.85% >> > freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org 1691 61577 97.33% >> >> > Ideas? >> >> Would it help to change the order of the master site list? I assume >> that there are some which have everything. > > Unfortunately that wouldn't be much help to people who use MASTER_SORT. Yes. > I believe the best way would be to cleanup Mk/bsd.sites.mk. In > particular MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX. I plan to have a look at a more recent linux distribution for our linux_base. If I get the time, and if it will be fedora based (probably it will, as it may make the update a little bit more easy), this may mean the list will go back to what it was... > ports-mgmt/distilator can help identifying those sites. For instance: > > $ distilator /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10/ > > Result: > http://people.freebsd.org/~ehaupt/misc/linux_base-f10-distilator.log.gz > > A quick check would suggests to only keep: > $ zcat linux_base-f10-distilator.log.gz | grep ^200 | awk '{print $3}' \ > | perl -e 'use URI; while(<>) { chomp(); $u=URI->new($_); print > $u->host . "\n"; }' \ > | sort | uniq > > archives.fedoraproject.org > ftp.quicknet.nl > ftp.rhd.ru > ftp.udl.es > mirror.steadfast.net > > ...but reducing MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX to those hosts shows that > not even those > mirrors are consistent. Hence my prior suggestion to get a complete :( > set of all distfiles > needed by ports using MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX and mirror those on > reliable mirrors. Should be easy to do (if a mirror is available). > I can assume that task if that's fine with emulation@ :-) I am fine with this. I try to deprecate the linux*f[6789]* ports this week (I have to make up my mind if it will be one or two months of grace time). If you just spend the time to have a look at the fc4 and f10 ones, everything should arrive at a sane situation after the expiration date. Bye, Alexander. -- Hindsight is an exact science. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110228104240.32245ke5o34pco40>