Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 21:30:06 +0100 (CET) From: Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de> To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG, jhein@symmetricom.com Subject: Re: AMD E-350 Message-ID: <201103142030.p2EKU6rv087366@lurza.secnetix.de> In-Reply-To: <19838.28706.591314.928087@gossamer.timing.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Hein wrote: > Some of this definitely pushing the envelope right now, so atom is > likely more right for you. But using arm for this space (and low > single digit W instead of 10-ish) seems not that far away. Well, the Atom N330 has a TDP of only 8 W, which isn't that bad for a 1.6 GHz 64bit 4-way processor (2 cores + hyperthreading). Of course, ARM processors may certainly have even better performance/watt ratio. But I think I stay with i386- compatible hardware for my particular case. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd "If you think C++ is not overly complicated, just what is a protected abstract virtual base pure virtual private destructor, and when was the last time you needed one?" -- Tom Cargil, C++ Journal
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201103142030.p2EKU6rv087366>