Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:42:00 +0300 From: Krutov Mikle <nekoexmachina@gmail.com> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HAL must die! Message-ID: <20110317144200.GA28942@takino.org> In-Reply-To: <il2qar$ka1$1@dough.gmane.org> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1103061251530.95312@abbf.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> <il2qar$ka1$1@dough.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:32:59PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 06/03/2011 19:56, Lars Eighner wrote: > >Using the -C switch with portupgrade, I am managing to turn WITH_HAL off in > >ports that I install or upgrade. Is there a way to make this a global > >default? > > > >Is there a (convenient) way to list ports that might pull in HAL without > >having a configuration switch? > > Um, why exactly are so many people against HAL? It's the only > cross-platform thing available for non-Linux systems which handles > device enumeration, hotplugs, etc. > Hi Ivan! As for me, it is like a habit: I've installed Xorg + HAL for the first time; I've seen that my config is ignored; I disabled HAL by-default in make.conf :) -- With best regards, Mikle Krutov, Bercut ltd. VA$I engeneer.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110317144200.GA28942>