Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 08:02:31 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn <gljennjohn@googlemail.com> To: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Firefox 4 - Beta Message-ID: <20110319080231.684d0fd9@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=WmhP_=4p_i2Fu6qgKMZh3h3S-4%2BNgPbgjRd=0@mail.gmail.com> References: <rhk948-1bv1.ln1@news.hansenet.de> <4D723F43.4040506@FreeBSD.org> <4lhc48-s332.ln1@news.hansenet.de> <4D73BD6A.7000404@swa.org.ru> <8v9d48-0qi1.ln1@news.hansenet.de> <AANLkTi=mdLSHo_PRdBsKAdzdLBhUpMSoRhmnc_XtmxiO@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=WmhP_=4p_i2Fu6qgKMZh3h3S-4%2BNgPbgjRd=0@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:07:28 -0600 "Edwin L. Culp W." <edwinlculp@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm assuming that we are close to having firefox4 in the tree as > firefox. It can't be too soon. I have not found any drawbacks to it > in the couple weeks of testing. > Unfortunately, it still goes crazy like the older versions and eats 100% of the CPU for no apparent reason. Otherwise it's no worse than 3.x was. -- Gary Jennejohn
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110319080231.684d0fd9>