Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:45:37 -0400
From:      Kurt Lidl <lidl@pix.net>
To:        Johan van Selst <johans@stack.nl>
Cc:        Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely7.cicely.de>, Zhihao Yuan <lichray@gmail.com>, Pan Tsu <inyaoo@gmail.com>, ticso@cicely.de
Subject:   Re: [GSoC] About the idea: Unicode support in vi
Message-ID:  <20110325134537.GB21904@pix.net>
In-Reply-To: <20110325094044.GA41319@mud.stack.nl>
References:  <AANLkTikLbU--J2aVa00tzxWb9GAvjfGnUGovwYaXXqhp@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimKzTrLA%2BW4a73D=aS8fy9npeqvrS8Ua3oNKrjf@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTin=Y-z-Rt0cnd3MRg0JoSWJmhC3Uh2b32Bosgfi@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimDnA6jdj-MR7J2EGAQFn=%2BRrS9h32N5UWkaDUs@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinuQG2ew4R81861Ei7Czds0pGVFaD4ExheFpnnE@mail.gmail.com> <20110324111118.GF65750@cicely7.cicely.de> <AANLkTikzpFAux=TX9n8bRgGW8CFT%2BBPfRe1JEEpwj26O@mail.gmail.com> <20110324221757.GA20441@mud.stack.nl> <AANLkTi=m=gW7D0C%2BG6hsA=Nm-tikRmbGAC1uGSwS82PR@mail.gmail.com> <20110325094044.GA41319@mud.stack.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:40:44AM +0100, Johan van Selst wrote:
> Zhihao Yuan wrote:
> > > Could you please eleborate on the nvi-devel problems? I'm the current
> > > maintainer of this port, and as far as I know it's fully functional.
> > 1. It does not support non-Unicode encodings. Actually, these
> > encodings are mainstream in multi-byte encodings world. A proper
> > iconv-awared implementation should be able to handle all of the
> > encodings in `iconv -l`;
> > 2. It depends on DB3/4. We won't accept DB3/4 in base system and we
> > won't accept nvi-devel.
> > 3. It's not 100% compatible with nvi 1.79.
> 
> Thank you for explaining. Indeed, all valid points and I fully agree
> that nvi-devel is not fit for inclusion in base as it is. In fact, the
> nvi from base is probably a better starting point (than nvi-devel) to
> create an editor that is fully compatible with nvi 1.79 and supports all
> multi-byte encodings. And when you, or someone, else creates such an
> editor, I will be pleased to remove the obsoleted port of nvi-devel.

Has anyone looked at the nvi work that has taken place in NetBSD
in the last year or so?

I think they've put in a bunch of wide character support.  I'm not
sure if their DB code relies on bdb newer than what is in libc or not.

-Kurt



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110325134537.GB21904>