Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 20:23:14 -0400 From: Thomas Dickey <dickey@radix.net> To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Cc: FreeBSD current mailing list <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: xterm termcape :ti@:te@: Message-ID: <20110425002314.GA8998@saltmine.radix.net> In-Reply-To: <m21v0rmdb2.wl%randy@psg.com> References: <m2sjt8mbt4.wl%randy@psg.com> <8639l7bbt3.fsf@gmail.com> <20110424222634.GA24854@saltmine.radix.net> <m21v0rmdb2.wl%randy@psg.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 08:37:05AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: > no help from the following: >=20 > *** termcap~ Fri Mar 18 14:34:01 2011 > --- termcap Sun Apr 24 23:33:52 2011 > *************** > *** 3131,3136 **** > --- 3131,3137 ---- > # > # Customization begins here. > xterm-xfree86|xterm terminal emulator (XFree86):\ > + :te=3D\E[?1049l:ti=3D\E[?1049h:\ > :tc=3Dxterm-new: At this point, I'd check if less is using that entry (ktrace or truss should be able to show the open's on the termcap database, for instance). Also, I seem to recall some discussion about less' -X (--no-init) option. It's possible that someone's patched "less" for FreeBSD to make that -X option more or less permanent. That would be consistent with omitting ti/te from the termcap. --=20 Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (SunOS) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQFNtLwTtIqByHxlDocRAji7AJ9n1Eu8WFlHXk2Q5VpBm78OBhErHQCgkXMy EqNhNvrULIPxRAzxqXGURYs= =iYK9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110425002314.GA8998>