Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 20 May 2011 05:52:45 +1000
From:      Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@acm.org>
To:        freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Cc:        jeff@freebsd.org
Subject:   SCHED_ULE on sparc64
Message-ID:  <20110519195245.GA3039@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--jI8keyz6grp/JLjh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

[Cc'ing jeff@ as the "owner" of ULE]

I notice sparc64 is now the only architecture that doesn't support
ULE.  According to the sched_ule.c commit log, this is due to lack of
support for the 3rd argument to cpu_switch().  Followup to r202889,
committed as r203185 (MFC'd as r203554 and r203573) suggests that
cpu_switch() has now been fixed.  Are there still outstanding issues
preventing the use of ULE on sparc64 or did removing the #error just
fall thru the cracks?

--=20
Peter Jeremy

--jI8keyz6grp/JLjh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk3VdQ0ACgkQ/opHv/APuIcRQQCfeTFa6L0sdafZJsySWAM9Rtfw
ZfoAn0M92n5EwxIDVWMq9z8RgMOifWPh
=EBOV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--jI8keyz6grp/JLjh--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110519195245.GA3039>