Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 17:29:44 -0400 From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Cc: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [CFT] Update OpenJDK6 to b23 Message-ID: <201107081729.46242.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201107081623.50665.jkim@FreeBSD.org> References: <201107072002.16059.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <4E16D92C.5000508@FreeBSD.org> <201107081623.50665.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 08 July 2011 04:23 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Friday 08 July 2011 06:17 am, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > on 08/07/2011 03:02 Jung-uk Kim said the following: > > > I have a patch to update java/openjdk6 to b23: > > > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/openjdk6-b23.diff > > > > > > Please test and report any regression. > > > > Can this update be used as a chance to spin off icedtea web > > plugin into a separate port? > > I was going to do it separately but I think it's clearer. > > IcedTea-Web 1.1 port: > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/icedtea-web-ports.tar.gz > > (Updated) java/openjdk6 patch: > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/openjdk6-b23_1.diff BTW, I have alternative port/patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/icedtea-web-ports_1.tar.gz http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/openjdk6-b23_2.diff Basically, the IcedTea patch for IcedTea-Web is controlled by ICEDTEA option and it is turned on by default. I am not sure which is better. :-/ Jung-uk Kim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201107081729.46242.jkim>