Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 21:27:34 +0200 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports-system priorities rant (Re: sysutils/cfs) Message-ID: <201109131927.p8DJRYF9061927@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: Your message "Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:44:37 BST." <CADLo83-ZcVAeyznw5DtEHV1tOsBUrZLLR2HJxFjrX_QewpHysA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chris Rees wrote: > On 12 September 2011 22:18, Julian H. Stacey <jhs@berklix.com> wrote: > > Matthias Andree wrote: > >> >> An obscure piece of software is undesirable (and shouldn't be ported in > >> >> the first place). > >> > > >> > Bullshit! > >> > >> I think that suffices. If the discussion is getting emotional, we > >> should stop it. > > > > No. You should stop advocating killing ports, or leave, or be revoked. > > FreeBSD would be better without immature ports slaughterers. > > > > Julian, > > Your arguments have become excessively ad-hominem, and please don't > think you're upsetting anyone in the slightest with them. > > Use rational and technical arguments, or take a break. > > Chris Revised reply as I subsequently notice Chris Rees lack of attribution falsely implies I wrote stuff I did not. > >> >> the first place). > >> > > >> > Bullshit! I did not write that. That was From Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> In reply to Matthias Andree Fri, 9 Sep 2011 07:22:10 +0200 http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2011-September/070018.html Seems Chris's butcher colleague Matthias annoyed Erik too. Further Chris's unattributed chunk > > Bullshit! > > I think that suffices. If the discussion is getting emotional, we > should stop it. Was not from or to me, but was: From: Matthias Andree <mandree@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 18:06:30 +0200 To: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2011-September/070075.html Only Chris's final bit had me as sender or recipient, namely: > > I think that suffices. If the discussion is getting emotional, we > > should stop it. > > No. You should stop advocating killing ports, which was not to Chris but was: From Julian H. Stacey jhs at berklix.com Tue Sep 13 08:44:10 UTC 2011 To Matthias Andree http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2011-September/070164.html Chris's lack of attribution checking was misleading, but not suprising, Chris Rees it was who wanted to kick out procmail. Poor judgement. A few ports butchers should lose commit bits before ports/ will be safe again. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below, not above; Indent with "> "; Cumulative like a play script. Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. http://www.softwarefreedomday.org 17 Sept, http://berklix.org/sfd/ 22 Oct.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201109131927.p8DJRYF9061927>