Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:03:53 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: office@FreeBSD.org Cc: maho@FreeBSD.org Subject: Any reason to keep OpenOffice.org 2 in the tree? Message-ID: <20110919150353.GB90102@azathoth.lan>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi, This is an open question, in particular direction of maho@ :) Do we really need to keep OpenOffice.org 2.* in the ports tree? According to: http://www.freshports.org/vuxml.php?vid=c97d7a37-2233-11df-96dd-001b2134ef46|f2b43905-3545-11e0-8e81-0022190034c0 it is vulnerable, and I'm not sure we still have users for OpenOffice.org 2.x. But I may be wrong Any opinion? regards, Bapt --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk53WdkACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyTBQCgpKcGOo+jSMehRzL+DnGSA4yf X/AAnRl7TDVIR8QzhCVLmk7ZvmL8BKzS =BT6b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110919150353.GB90102>