Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:07:45 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: Daniil Cherednik <dcherednik@masterhost.ru>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.2 + apache == a LOT of sigprocmask Message-ID: <20111115090745.GO50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <4EC17F57.5030008@FreeBSD.org> References: <4EC17AAF.9050807@FreeBSD.org> <4EC17F57.5030008@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--tB7rUN7dYh5/jfh0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:51:35PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > On 11/14/2011 12:31, Doug Barton wrote: > > Trying to track down a load problem we're seeing on 8.2-RELEASE-p4 i386 > > in a busy web hosting environment I came across the following post: > >=20 > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2011-October/23452= 0.html > >=20 > > That basically describes what we're seeing as well, including the > > "doesn't happen on Linux" part. > >=20 > > Does anyone have any ideas about this? > >=20 > > With incredibly similar stuff running on 7.x we didn't see this problem, > > so it seems to be something new in 8. >=20 > Just took a closer look at our ktrace, and actually our pattern is > slightly different than the one in that post. In ours the second option > is null, but the third is set: >=20 > 74195 httpd 0.000017 RET sigprocmask 0 > 74195 httpd 0.000013 CALL sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,0,0xbfbf89d4) > 74195 httpd 0.000009 RET sigprocmask 0 > 74195 httpd 0.000013 CALL sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,0,0xbfbf89d4) > 74195 httpd 0.000009 RET sigprocmask 0 > 74195 httpd 0.000012 CALL sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,0,0xbfbf89d4) >=20 > But repeated hundreds of times in a row. The calls cannot come from rtld, they are generated by some setjmp() invocation. If signal-safety is not needed, sigsetjmp() should be used instead. Quick grep of the apache httpd source shows a single setjmp() in their copy of pcre. No idea is it to safe to change setjmp() into sigsetjmp(?, 0). --tB7rUN7dYh5/jfh0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEUEARECAAYFAk7CK+EACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4g34ACeIehqW4571CMhvULXoPb/YAmr eCMAl2asO0EOax3iKkh0SMh81Y/X5Og= =TdFv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tB7rUN7dYh5/jfh0--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111115090745.GO50300>