Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:14:28 +0000
From:      Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Cc:        Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@britannica.bec.de>
Subject:   Re: easy way to determine if a stream or fd is seekable
Message-ID:  <20111116131428.GA40723@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20111116102239.GA2687@britannica.bec.de>
References:  <20111115202450.GA73512@freebsd.org> <20111116102239.GA2687@britannica.bec.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed Nov 16 11, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 08:24:50PM +0000, Alexander Best wrote:
> > one of the things i'm missing is an easy way to determine, whether a stream or
> > fd is seekable. i checked the dd(1) and hd(1) sources and those tools are
> > performing so much stuff just to find out if this is the case, and they still
> > are doing a very poor job.
> 
> Isn't the primary issue that FreeBSD doesn't properly report errors for
> lseek(2)? I think you should start from that and not hack around the
> fallout...

what do you mean? lseek(2) returns -1, when the file descriptor is not
seekable. i fired lseek(2) at all sorts of file types (dir, sockets, ...)
and it always returned the correct result.

cheers.
alex

> 
> Joerg



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111116131428.GA40723>