Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:03:42 +0100 From: rank1seeker@gmail.com To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CPUTYPE and friends, from 'make.conf' benchmark Message-ID: <20111206.170342.731.2@DOMY-PC> In-Reply-To: <CAGH67wTjGyhWAMYsCtzp8X7nN=yswOGntO=46AmT7yxymHSQ%2Bg@mail.gmail.com> References: <20111205.171654.020.1@DOMY-PC> <CAGH67wTjGyhWAMYsCtzp8X7nN=yswOGntO=46AmT7yxymHSQ%2Bg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
# /bin/sh -c "gcc -v -x c -E -mtune=native /dev/null -o /dev/null 2>&1 | grep mtune | sed -e 's/.*mtune=//'" generic For target machine, it returned 'generic' Now only with CPUTYPE in 'make.conf': -- CPUTYPE?=core2 -- > Also, you should set these in src.conf. Sticking them in make.conf is > going to annoy people when you ask why your ports are breaking ;) > > Chris I want my ports, to also be optimized for target CPU, not just base. None of my ports got broken yet. Rebuilded can ... Tests are started AFTER a reboot! There is no bgfsck, as per rc.conf: -- background_fsck=NO fsck_y_enable=YES fsck_y_flags=-C -- Same multiuser enviroment Test done once. After running: '# time unixbench', final score was: 395.4 Completed in 22.8 min Time is SAME as with generic binaries, but score is just a 1.2 higher, which is too small to be relevant. What do you think about this? Domagoj Smolčić
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111206.170342.731.2>