Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:02:05 -0700
From:      Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Clang - what is the story?
Message-ID:  <20120122070205.GA13081@hemlock.hydra>
In-Reply-To: <20120121154313.53d3fec6@gumby.homeunix.com>
References:  <4F1AAB66.5070100@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120121133506.7bcfaec9@gumby.homeunix.com> <20120121154313.53d3fec6@gumby.homeunix.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 03:43:13PM +0000, RW wrote:
> 
> I was just wondering what would have happened if Apple hadn't backed
> clang/LLVM as BSD licensed projects. Was there a plan B (other than
> gcc 4.2.1) or did Apple save the *BSD world? 

The backup plan was probably PCC.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120122070205.GA13081>