Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:20:11 -0800
From:      Chip Camden <sterling@camdensoftware.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: /usr/home vs /home
Message-ID:  <20120221062011.GE6294@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com>
In-Reply-To: <201202211240.53859.erich@alogreentechnologies.com>
References:  <4F3ECF23.5000706@fisglobal.com> <201202210910.20658.erich@alogreentechnologies.com> <20120221052603.GC6294@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <201202211240.53859.erich@alogreentechnologies.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
Quoth Erich Dollansky on Tuesday, 21 February 2012:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tuesday 21 February 2012 12:26:03 Chip Camden wrote:
> > Quoth Erich Dollansky on Tuesday, 21 February 2012:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On Monday 20 February 2012 21:44:43 Da Rock wrote:
> > > > On 02/18/12 17:47, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > > 
> > > > >> There may have been a historic reason, but now it is philosophical - trying
> > > > > when I got my hands for the first time on a BSD system, the machine has had several 5MB hard disks.
> > > > >
> > > > > I assume that what now is called partitioning came from the need to have several disks to run a serious system.
> > > > >
> > > > > And yes, it was possible to boot and run BSD with at least 20 users on several 5MB disks.
> > > > >
> > > > > Erich
> > > > Erich, can I be so bold as to ask what brand the disks were? And tax 
> > > > your memory as to when?
> > > 
> > > it was DEC PDP-11 with a strange drive. One disk was fixed, one was removable. This is the reason why it was easy to switch the operating system. RL .. something like this was the disk name.
> > > 
> > 
> > I believe the 5MB removable were RL01.  They also had a 10MB removable
> > RL02, which we used for software distribution.  We resold them to our
> > customers at $170 each.
> 
> yes, this sound familiar. The RL02 came later.
> 
> I think that tapes were much more common for software distribution those days.
> 
> I still remember the responsiveness of RSX-11 even compared to FreeBSD under all circumstances. Real time is real time.
> 
> Erich
> > 

Oh man -- we wrote process control software in Fortran-77 on RSX-11M to
automate our software distribution processes.  That was the best!  DECNET
to communicate between systems.

-- 
.O. | Sterling (Chip) Camden      | http://camdensoftware.com
..O | sterling@camdensoftware.com | http://chipsquips.com
OOO | 2048R/D6DBAF91              | http://chipstips.com

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPQzebAAoJEIpckszW26+RlGMIAJcw9e469rha0O8BfmJtfUrY
Srm5AiurmgJkFPU1jKm7y3cZHGd7Nx8rlc0Gkbn2AtwCSwmWyHOAx1XkHj+WZOPD
9dJYuefNTYiUbllSKBqjQj4o1B5C9+yOyyNOPbgV7MrHkn8YsM+ilVDzNu2LkELr
6LmJwEPNiP9DnA7Zg5nYXoeqTu07VgUt1Wayz5WoTTmX1z2xpWMnZjzuyBor137F
GWlEhYtO0sz7ie3eEKq4GoKaTyEWZllRqVlpqaaOm78nYnY68InKrhuv5RDmxjB1
xCnlVJlPbkYSGjmniLasBL1rek48xSl7bqz6u4ADIg31jF2kgRole2b3DadV6j4=
=udBa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120221062011.GE6294>