Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 12:23:41 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade -> portmaster Rosetta Stone? Message-ID: <20120303112341.GJ44287@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <4F51D392.8080605@FreeBSD.org> References: <CA%2BE3k93doEmK7YpiZLgBCB5WUmOeCCLLLQBak_-Nx8sGqiafhQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABzXLYM47FjwmEvKijOp41Hn0KhTTPJ-dnX58PxTS8oUff-THQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F4BA7CE.20107@FreeBSD.org> <20120303010602.6daeb272@cox.net> <4F51D392.8080605@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > > Doug, is there a way to emulate portupgrade's "-k" (keep going) option, > > to have the remaining list of ports to be built still continue > > processing even if one port's build fails? > > You haven't missed it, the answer is no. It's part of that "portmaster > can't read minds" problem that if something fails, I have no way of > knowing if the rest of the updates should stop as a result. They should not stop. > I may add it someday, but it's not trivial, and it's not a priority. I have two (in fact, 5) reference hosts, whose only reason of existence is: csup the ports tree, build all updated stuff. The script that does this uses: portupgrade -arR -m BATCH=yes and it worked the last few years. I'm trying to use portmaster on one of the hosts, with: portmaster --no-confirm --no-term-title --index --no-index-fetch -a If it waits for some input, I'm unhappy 8-( -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120303112341.GJ44287>