Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 09:00:06 +0400 From: Roman Bogorodskiy <novel@FreeBSD.org> To: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libtool question again Message-ID: <20120307050004.GA2988@fsol> In-Reply-To: <4F54826C.7070701@FreeBSD.org> References: <20120304121947.GC1250@kloomba> <4F54826C.7070701@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alex Dupre wrote: > Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: > > I'm planning to update security/gnutls from 2.12.16 to 2.12.17. A new > > interface has been added and the shared library version was updated > > accordingly: current was incremented and revision set to 0, just like > > the libtool documentation suggests: > > And 'age' ? If only a new interface has been added, age should be > incremented too, and so the shared library bump is not needed. If so, > you can use: The age was incremented. > USE_AUTOTOOLS= libtool > USE_GNOME= ltverhack > > to avoid bumping. I'm using it and it doesn't help: libgnutls.so.47 becomes libgnutls.so.48 (where 48 is 'current'). Roman Bogorodskiy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120307050004.GA2988>