Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:29:58 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: rank1seeker@gmail.com Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BUG: REL 9.0 - 'boot0cfg' fails with providers of non 512 byte sectorsize Message-ID: <201203261629.58303.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20120326.180253.607.2@DOMY-PC> References: <20120325.150506.135.2@DOMY-PC> <201203261017.41420.jhb@freebsd.org> <20120326.180253.607.2@DOMY-PC>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday, March 26, 2012 2:02:53 pm rank1seeker@gmail.com wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> > To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org > Cc: rank1seeker@gmail.com, hackers@freebsd.org > Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:17:41 -0400 > Subject: Re: BUG: REL 9.0 - 'boot0cfg' fails with providers of non 512 byte sectorsize > > > On Sunday, March 25, 2012 11:05:06 am rank1seeker@gmail.com wrote: > > > I've created a vnode image (md0) with sectorsizes of 8192 and 4096 > > > > > > After installing MBR's bootcode '/boot/boot0', in provider 'md0' I did: > > > # boot0cfg -o noupdate -m 0xc md0 > > > boot0cfg: read /dev/md0: Invalid argument > > > # boot0cfg -v md0 > > > boot0cfg: read /dev/md0: Invalid argument > > > > > > If custom sectorsize isn't specifed(512 bytes), then both above CMDs will > > work. > > > > MBR bootstraps (such as boot0) assume a 512 byte sector. They won't boot > > correctly on media with a different sector size. So even if you "fixed" > > boot0cfg, you wouldn't have a bootable system. > > > > -- > > John Baldwin > > > > > Is it so? > This is also true for '/boot/mbr' file? Yes. > Well, majority of PC's are still BIOS bassed so MBR scheme is still around and there are also now HDD's with 4b sector sizes and SSD's with 4b and 8k sector sizes. > > So how does things work in those cases, without GPT? The BIOS still emulates 512 byte sectors. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201203261629.58303.jhb>