Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:59:29 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there any modern alternative to pstack? Message-ID: <201204160959.29089.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20120415093029.GR2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <4F775DF5.1020704@rawbw.com> <4F8A8CD2.5020103@rawbw.com> <20120415093029.GR2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday, April 15, 2012 5:30:29 am Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 01:54:42AM -0700, Yuri wrote: > > On 04/05/2012 07:06, John Baldwin wrote: > > >In this case we probably should become the upstream maintainer. My patch > > >actually bumps the version to 1.3 as it is sort of intended to do that. > > > > bsd-pstack on SourceForge is dead. Sole project owner isn't responsive, > > and as per SF policy they don't allow anyone to take over such project. > > They suggest to fork. > > So will you object if I create a new project on SF, say bsd-pstack-new, > > will import the current source and apply your patch and make a release? > > I will also update pstack port so that it will become current. > It seems that the license is two-clause BSD. > My opinion is that such tool should be imported into the base. I'm fine with putting it into the base. If so, we should import 1.2 first I think and then apply the 1.3 patch. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201204160959.29089.jhb>