Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:04:36 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule Message-ID: <20120821070436.GE23607@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <5033253D.4060807@FreeBSD.org> References: <20120820194313.GC23607@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <CAL409KxPwGaCS-BL_tW7P1cX_Jk1V_h8wBdTUjbCWxU8fA_WtQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120820232147.GD23607@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <5033253D.4060807@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--6Vw0j8UKbyX0bfpA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 07:05:49AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 21/08/2012 00:21, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:09:46AM +0300, Vitaly Magerya wrote: > >> Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote: > >>> Please [...] ask question about pkgng [...] > >> > >> What would be the best practice of mixing ports with packages? > >> > >> The use case I have in mind is compiling Xorg ports locally > >> WITH_NEW_XORG and WITH_KMS, and using packages from > >> pkgbeta.freebsd.org for everything else. Is there some mixture of pkg > >> and portmaster flags that allows this kind of setup? > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" > >=20 > > There is no best practice for that unfortunatly, (as actually) the best= for you > > is maybe to build your own pkgng repostories? > > http://wiki.freebsd.org/PkgPrimer#Using_poudriere for example? > >=20 > > We are open to suggestion here :) >=20 > At the moment, it is about as tricky as mixing locally compiled ports > with pkg_tools packages: ie. it might work, or it might leave you a > quivering, sobbing mess lost in a pit of dark despair. >=20 > One thing that should help is a proposal to record metadata like the SVN > revision number of the ports tree used to build repository packages into > the repository catalogue (repo.sqlite), so users can in principle check > out the same revision locally to build their own ports. Unfortunately > no one has written that yet, and its probably too late for it to make it > into release-1.0. >=20 yes but it should definitly find its way to 1.1! regards, Bapt --6Vw0j8UKbyX0bfpA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlAzMwQACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ey+LACdE90y4EnUKQ+gxT/F/Agn0I9+ x1MAni5R71mz4vMO/p+hf5gh6JpmjThd =Eopt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6Vw0j8UKbyX0bfpA--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120821070436.GE23607>