Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 00:37:29 +0800 From: Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@FreeBSD.org> To: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> Cc: python <python@freebsd.org>, portmgr@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Simple change into Mk/bsd.python.mk Message-ID: <20120902163729.GA42749@FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw> In-Reply-To: <50434AAF.7070005@yandex.ru> References: <50430B39.6040707@yandex.ru> <CAKBkRUyV_CBTdY4xN7K_6PH4rQN80oU9%2BpQpscbmdLz-qAW_NQ@mail.gmail.com> <50434AAF.7070005@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--jI8keyz6grp/JLjh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5
Content-Disposition: inline
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 16:01:51 +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
>
> I believe that original intention was not to hardcode the zope port
> version. Yes, there is only one zope version at the moment, but there
> may be more in future. Just though about ports that needs different zope
> versions. Please tell me if I understand it wrong.
>
We have the same thought. Sorry that my expression was not clear.
My proposed patch is attached, and what I just wanted was reducing
hardcoded dependency of ${LOCALBASE}/bin/zopectl . I am not sure which
one is better, so please just commit one you like.
BTW, should we bother portmgr at this point? I believe they have much
more important things need to deal with. But I am still happy to hear
any suggestion from them if they want to step in.
Regards,
Li-Wen
--
Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@FreeBSD.org>
http://lwhsu.org
--jI8keyz6grp/JLjh--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120902163729.GA42749>