Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 02:02:12 -0500 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> Cc: Christer Solskogen <christer.solskogen@gmail.com>, FreeBSD <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Andreas Nilsson <andrnils@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Clang as default compiler Message-ID: <20120912070212.GA12778@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <CADLo83-v=S0xnnaCKY6u4Y2NcgUJA2pg3EER%2B%2BNDxxJRy_wYSg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPS9%2BSsCSsM2DPgdd=016yTf1tE6Y0d=7FV-h9NjXb_j3eET2Q@mail.gmail.com> <20120912060420.GE31029@lonesome.com> <CAMVU60as9p9GxDCJNqCEavQ4U=S5V3OnovN53oyGxRuFOZ0kiA@mail.gmail.com> <CADLo83-v=S0xnnaCKY6u4Y2NcgUJA2pg3EER%2B%2BNDxxJRy_wYSg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 08:00:46AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: > We don't want thousands of PRs duplicating the information from a simple > list of failures. Thanks, that was the point I was trying to make. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120912070212.GA12778>