Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 12:04:53 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: Nikolay Denev <ndenev@gmail.com> Cc: svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r240742 - head/sys/net Message-ID: <20121005080453.GL34622@glebius.int.ru> In-Reply-To: <F01FAEFE-8148-412D-9772-A48A1ADA64A7@gmail.com> References: <201209201005.q8KA5BqZ094414@svn.freebsd.org> <2966A49C-DE3F-4559-A799-D1E9C0A74A9C@gmail.com> <20121005070914.GI34622@glebius.int.ru> <F01FAEFE-8148-412D-9772-A48A1ADA64A7@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 11:02:14AM +0300, Nikolay Denev wrote: N> > On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 09:34:07AM +0300, Nikolay Denev wrote: N> > N> > Date: Thu Sep 20 10:05:10 2012 N> > N> > New Revision: 240742 N> > N> > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/240742 N> > N> > N> > N> > Log: N> > N> > Convert lagg(4) to use if_transmit instead of if_start. N> > N> > N> > N> > In collaboration with: thompsa, sbruno, fabient N> > N> > N> > N> > Modified: N> > N> > head/sys/net/if_lagg.c N> > ... N> > N> Are there any plans to MFC this change and the one for if_bridge? N> > N> This one applies cleanly on RELENG_9 and I will have the opportunity to test it later today. N> > N> > Sure we can, if you test it. Thanks! N> > N> > -- N> > Totus tuus, Glebius. N> N> Patch applied and module reloaded. N> N> I'm testing with 16 iperf instances from a RELENG_8 machine connected to a 10G port on N> Extreme Networks switch with ix(4) interface, and on the other side is the machine with if_lagg, N> with Intel quad igb(4) interface. N> N> /0 /1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 N> Load Average ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| N> N> Interface Traffic Peak Total N> lagg0 in 464.759 MB/s 465.483 MB/s 25.686 GB N> out 14.900 MB/s 22.543 MB/s 3.845 GB N> N> lo0 in 0.000 KB/s 0.000 KB/s 2.118 MB N> out 0.000 KB/s 0.000 KB/s 2.118 MB N> N> igb3 in 116.703 MB/s 117.322 MB/s 7.235 GB N> out 3.427 MB/s 5.225 MB/s 2.303 GB N> N> igb2 in 116.626 MB/s 117.301 MB/s 8.248 GB N> out 4.789 MB/s 12.069 MB/s 3.331 GB N> N> igb1 in 116.845 MB/s 117.138 MB/s 6.406 GB N> out 4.222 MB/s 6.439 MB/s 267.546 MB N> N> igb0 in 116.595 MB/s 117.298 MB/s 6.045 GB N> out 2.984 MB/s 7.678 MB/s 221.413 MB N> N> N> (High Load Average is because of simultaneously running disk IO test on the machine). N> N> And the same in the other direction : N> N> /0 /1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 N> Load Average ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| N> N> Interface Traffic Peak Total N> lagg0 in 14.427 MB/s 14.939 MB/s 155.813 GB N> out 458.935 MB/s 459.789 MB/s 28.429 GB N> N> lo0 in 0.000 KB/s 0.000 KB/s 2.118 MB N> out 0.000 KB/s 0.000 KB/s 2.118 MB N> N> igb3 in 2.797 MB/s 3.540 MB/s 39.869 GB N> out 117.452 MB/s 121.691 MB/s 8.612 GB N> N> igb2 in 3.641 MB/s 5.412 MB/s 40.939 GB N> out 116.963 MB/s 127.053 MB/s 11.185 GB N> N> igb1 in 4.202 MB/s 5.301 MB/s 39.097 GB N> out 116.286 MB/s 117.230 MB/s 5.356 GB N> N> igb0 in 3.818 MB/s 4.713 MB/s 38.755 GB N> out 116.315 MB/s 117.053 MB/s 6.142 GB A cool test environment you do have :) Have you got results numbers prior to applying the patch? -- Totus tuus, Glebius.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121005080453.GL34622>