Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:50:01 GMT From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tommy_Sonne_Alstr=F8m?= <tommy@anakin.ws> To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: amd64/173235: Have received two crashes within 1 day after installing new packages: Fatal trap 12: page fault in kernel mode Message-ID: <201210311250.q9VCo1Wx025049@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR amd64/173235; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tommy_Sonne_Alstr=F8m?= <tommy@anakin.ws>
To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: amd64/173235: Have received two crashes within 1 day after installing
new packages: Fatal trap 12: page fault in kernel mode
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:44:01 +0100
I'm very sorry, I just realized that I copied the 1st readout twice. The
2nd readout was like this
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
fault virtual address = 0x6
fault code = supervisor read data, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff809da0cc
stack pointer = 0x28:0xffffff8451f549b0
frame pointer = 0x28:0xffffff8451f54a40
code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b
= DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1
processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
current process = 1068 (named)
trap number = 12
panic: page fault
cpuid = 0
KDB: stack backtrace:
#0 0xffffffff808680fe at kdb_backtrace+0x5e
#1 0xffffffff80832cb7 at panic+0x187
#2 0xffffffff80b185a0 at trap_fatal+0x290
#3 0xffffffff80b188e9 at trap_pfault+0x1f9
#4 0xffffffff80b18daf at trap+0x3df
#5 0xffffffff80b0324f at calltrap+0x8
#6 0xffffffff809f75a7 at udp6_bind+0xa7
#7 0xffffffff808a152e at kern_bind+0xde
#8 0xffffffff808a15a1 at sys_bind+0x41
#9 0xffffffff80b17e90 at amd64_syscall+0x4e0
#10 0xffffffff80b03537 at Xfast_syscall+0xf7
Uptime: 9h41m13s
Dumping 3411 out of 16088
MB:..1%..11%..21%..31%..41%..51%..61%..71%..81%..91%
On 10/31/2012 01:35 PM, Tommy Sonne Alstrøm wrote:
> Thanks for the answer.
>
> Please note, that I had no network shares mounted when the 2nd crash
> occurred.
>
> Sorry if I chose the wrong category.
>
> BR Tommy
>
> On 10/31/2012 01:31 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> This looks like an smbfs/netsmb related bug.
>>
>> P.S. There was no reason to chose 'amd64' category.
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201210311250.q9VCo1Wx025049>