Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 07:43:25 +0900 (JST) From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: utisoft@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org, mjg@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mountlate being too mount-happy Message-ID: <20121118.074325.564844639489846824.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <CADLo839wqzAPenuQDOVpQ74yjCMkPQNceKpvs_N9XNwMLrkC1A@mail.gmail.com> References: <CADLo83-pYaXyg8AejwVG6TiWKu8P5Y82PQP5-qyUUjfzZG0dXw@mail.gmail.com> <CAF6rxgkQZ-FUcMsMmV31s87kwdo0D3bJti-qTWbG7vsXz5EjYQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADLo839wqzAPenuQDOVpQ74yjCMkPQNceKpvs_N9XNwMLrkC1A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----Security_Multipart(Sun_Nov_18_07_43_25_2012_412)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote in <CADLo839wqzAPenuQDOVpQ74yjCMkPQNceKpvs_N9XNwMLrkC1A@mail.gmail.com>: ut> On 2 November 2012 14:21, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> wrote: ut> > On 2 November 2012 09:56, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote: ut> >> I'll take a look. ut> > ut> > untested: ut> ut> Based on Eitan's patch, I've tested this one, and documented it in mount(8) too: ut> ut> http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/mountonlylate.diff ut> ut> Does anyone have any suggestions/objections/urge to approve it? Is the original problem due to backgrounding of NFS mount only? If so, implementing prevention of duplicate invocation into mount(8) would be more reasonable, I think. -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Sun_Nov_18_07_43_25_2012_412)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAlCoEw0ACgkQTyzT2CeTzy3VHgCfcZOAyukTouSY+HC2ENs77QRe ZqMAn0jEPeTZ1zKC8vU29/jIfd1cao5Z =gDb9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Sun_Nov_18_07_43_25_2012_412)----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121118.074325.564844639489846824.hrs>