Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 01:22:45 +0100 From: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com> To: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org, mjg@FreeBSD.org, utisoft@gmail.com Subject: Re: mountlate being too mount-happy Message-ID: <20121118002245.GB15055@dft-labs.eu> In-Reply-To: <20121118.074325.564844639489846824.hrs@allbsd.org> References: <CADLo83-pYaXyg8AejwVG6TiWKu8P5Y82PQP5-qyUUjfzZG0dXw@mail.gmail.com> <CAF6rxgkQZ-FUcMsMmV31s87kwdo0D3bJti-qTWbG7vsXz5EjYQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADLo839wqzAPenuQDOVpQ74yjCMkPQNceKpvs_N9XNwMLrkC1A@mail.gmail.com> <20121118.074325.564844639489846824.hrs@allbsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 07:43:25AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote > in <CADLo839wqzAPenuQDOVpQ74yjCMkPQNceKpvs_N9XNwMLrkC1A@mail.gmail.com>: > > ut> On 2 November 2012 14:21, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> wrote: > ut> > On 2 November 2012 09:56, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote: > ut> >> I'll take a look. > ut> > > ut> > untested: > ut> > ut> Based on Eitan's patch, I've tested this one, and documented it in mount(8) too: > ut> > ut> http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/mountonlylate.diff > ut> > ut> Does anyone have any suggestions/objections/urge to approve it? > > Is the original problem due to backgrounding of NFS mount only? If > so, implementing prevention of duplicate invocation into mount(8) > would be more reasonable, I think. > We have 2 distinct scripts that try to mount same set of filesystems. I think this is the real bug here and proposed patches makes it go away in an IMHO acceptable way. -- Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik gmail.com>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121118002245.GB15055>