Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 19 Dec 2012 20:36:00 +0200
From:      Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        mjacob@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Unmapped I/O
Message-ID:  <20121219183600.GX71906@kib.kiev.ua>
In-Reply-To: <17479.1355941463@critter.freebsd.dk>
References:  <20121219135451.GU71906@kib.kiev.ua> <50D1D2BD.80107@freebsd.org> <50D1ECC5.2070209@freebsd.org> <17252.1355935960@critter.freebsd.dk> <20121219172320.GW71906@kib.kiev.ua> <17479.1355941463@critter.freebsd.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--Ge5ZftkQPdHHxjIb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 06:24:23PM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> --------
> In message <20121219172320.GW71906@kib.kiev.ua>, Konstantin Belousov writ=
es:
>=20
> >Still, the i386 cannot have much benefit from the unmapped buffers,
> >just because thre is no facilities similar to the direct map for amd64.
> >i386 must use transient mapping even for unmapped buffers to copy
> >the data to the usermode.
>=20
> Wrong, a Adaptec 1542 could DMA directly into or out of any spot
> of memory and that could have been mapped in userland but not in
> kernel.
And how this can be used while keeping on-disk data coherent with the
buffer ? It can by used by physio, but not for the normal file i/o, which
caches the file data in the vnode pages or buffers for non-unified cache.
The transient mapping is needed to copy between kernel buffer and usermode
address on i386.

>=20
> >Also, as I understand the history, VMIO buffers, or unified page/buffer
> >cache, only appeared in the FreeBSD.
>=20
> Correct, but truth to be told, they have probably delayed our
> implementation of unmapped buffers by about 10 years...
Mapped bufers only become an issue on really multi-core machines.
Before large SMP become ubiquitous, additional complexity of the
transient mappings definitely not worth it.

>=20
> I don't blame John & David however, making that full leap in
> one go would have required the mythical HeldenProgrammer, there
> were a lot of cruft we had to get out of the way first.
>=20
> --=20
> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe   =20
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetenc=
e.

--Ge5ZftkQPdHHxjIb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
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=PCNw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Ge5ZftkQPdHHxjIb--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121219183600.GX71906>