Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 23:01:56 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: regression: if_rue device doesn't attach on HEAD Message-ID: <201301042301.56493.hselasky@c2i.net> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgkabT3wc_w098RQ%2BYJwjsHSNikd6goYfNEXiCxiskaoDA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAF6rxgkhVpk=LQ9Fdz4Zzk3RcMd-HHv3s5P3LniRHkxC1chqoQ@mail.gmail.com> <201301042241.15044.hselasky@c2i.net> <CAF6rxgkabT3wc_w098RQ%2BYJwjsHSNikd6goYfNEXiCxiskaoDA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 04 January 2013 22:50:38 Eitan Adler wrote: > On 4 January 2013 16:41, Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> wrote: > > This typically means set address failed, which in the XHCI is done in > > "HW". I'll look into if I find some time. Not sure what we can do about > > it. > Hi, > As I mentioned - it works in 9.1 so *something* regressed. The only which I can think of which caused this is the recently added ETRON patches. You can look in the xhci.c revision history and revert from the top? There aren't that many patches made in that area. > > You can try set first set config 255 and the config 0 on the parent HUB > > of this device using usbconfig. > > I'm not sure what you mean here. What command should I run? usbconfig -d X.1 set_config 255 usbconfig -d X.1 set_config 0 --HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201301042301.56493.hselasky>