Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 17:28:21 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: TCP_KEEPIDLE vs TCPTV_KEEP_IDLE Message-ID: <20130506132821.GA15182@glebius.int.ru> In-Reply-To: <CACyXjPxAeS0S54FYyibdNoXsGtHafCk1PU2-ha4s2cMf3NkWjQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CACyXjPzfw3SAGXa0u6xBQgn79VyGEq7wj9V4GgkRnCazD6-PmA@mail.gmail.com> <20130506082235.GV15182@FreeBSD.org> <CACyXjPzG7dQ4_6J9sziNYY3OFGNwvncobjktV6=c9%2BkfBctAsA@mail.gmail.com> <20130506132332.GZ15182@glebius.int.ru> <CACyXjPxAeS0S54FYyibdNoXsGtHafCk1PU2-ha4s2cMf3NkWjQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 06:26:14AM -0700, Richard Sharpe wrote: R> Thank you for that answer. I don't have the option to install FreeBSD R> 9.1. Maybe we will move to 9.1 in the future. R> R> However, I now understand the issues better. Of course that does R> complicate my proposal on Samba technical, just a little. I don't understand the proposal. Samba correctly compiles with support for the discussed socket options on those operating systems that support them. No "fixes" to Samba are required, everything works correctly. -- Totus tuus, Glebius.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130506132821.GA15182>