Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 17:46:18 +0200 From: Milan Obuch <freebsd-mips@dino.sk> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: Aleksandr Rybalko <ray@ddteam.net>, freebsd-mips@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ubiquiti EdgeRouter Lite works multi-user with -CURRENT. Message-ID: <20130520174618.10972497@zeta.dino.sk> In-Reply-To: <89337D9B-56D9-4DD5-B096-8BB7FD95D3A8@bsdimp.com> References: <CACVs6=_UHMvo6DSyXzvXxJ0eCcSsC%2Bk3yZ42ia5TGzgHduT2zA@mail.gmail.com> <20130516111059.38543d57@wind.dino.sk> <20130516131642.adfae355aa3bf7767e9b56e5@ddteam.net> <20130516124248.33ae4e05@wind.dino.sk> <51952112.9010607@rewt.org.uk> <20130517192206.5db0533f@zeta.dino.sk> <51966CB6.2040701@rewt.org.uk> <CACVs6=-0URQ2f7UqVxRdpuGpf103KOW9CTF6FFCGaGhvg3jOMw@mail.gmail.com> <20130520110659.1d1d2165@zeta.dino.sk> <D1F45DEB-3C3C-42D1-8EDE-94B18AB32152@bsdimp.com> <20130520164001.5f7d99b8@zeta.dino.sk> <519A3D8E.7010106@rewt.org.uk> <20130520172935.312f8c64@zeta.dino.sk> <89337D9B-56D9-4DD5-B096-8BB7FD95D3A8@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 20 May 2013 09:33:31 -0600, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > > On May 20, 2013, at 9:29 AM, Milan Obuch wrote: > > > On Mon, 20 May 2013 16:13:18 +0100, Joe Holden <lists@rewt.org.uk> > > wrote: > > > >> Milan Obuch wrote: > >>> On Mon, 20 May 2013 07:25:30 -0600, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On May 20, 2013, at 3:06 AM, Milan Obuch wrote: [ snip ] > >>> Thanks, I found it - device octm was unknowingly commented out. > >>> Maybe as I have no octm in devinfo I left it out, no idea. Now it > >>> works. > >>> > >>> Back to the original talk - GPIO. I found on Edgerouter Lite pin > >>> 11 is used for reset switch - aka 'Factory Default' button. > >>> > >>> Status is > >>> pin 11: 1 F/D<IN>, caps:<IN,OUT> > >>> when not pressed and > >>> pin 11: 0 F/D<IN>, caps:<IN,OUT> > >>> when pressed. > >>> > >>> However, I found a problem with ethernet driver. It works only in > >>> gigabit mode - connected to 100baseT switch is correctly > >>> negotiated, it seems, but no traffic flows, either way, probably. > >>> What could I do to diagnose root cause of this problem? > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Milan > > > >> I haven't seen that, but as a buildworld+kernel takes a couple of > >> days I'm a week or so behind (I know I know, cross building, but > >> still) > >> > > > > Well, I use both cross building and native building. My devices are > > not the top in speed scale, so both building moethods are usable > > for me. Native building is kind of stability benchmark for me... > > Anyway, sometimes I am a bit behind, too. > > I'm surprised you said a week. Buildworld for me is 8 hours, and a > kernel build without modules is on the order of 2-4 (I haven't kept > as close a track of that). But this is on my eval board with a 6-core > 600MHz processor. > > Warner In my case, I have dual core Cavium, should be 600 MHz too, but this is not in dmesg output (or maybe it's 500 MHz, in sysctl there is hw.model: CN5020p1.1-500-SCP line). But as it is currently with WITNESS option, performance is degraded a bit I think. Anyway, I am not a week behind actual source tree as Joe said - maybe he is not able to update more often than that. I will try full buildworld/buildkernel native on EdgeRouter Lite and report that. Regards, Milan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130520174618.10972497>