Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 22:21:56 +0300 From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Martin Wilke <miwi@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "ports@freebsd.org Ports" <ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: [CFH] FreeBSD 10 and ports Message-ID: <20130611192156.GU3047@kib.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <249D4A03-A62A-4033-9757-AF308D4422FF@FreeBSD.org> References: <249D4A03-A62A-4033-9757-AF308D4422FF@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--coMTZEyEfmE1nMIA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 02:50:03PM +0800, Martin Wilke wrote: >=20 > Dear All, >=20 > As we all know FreeBSD 10 brings a new compiler along, and for that we ne= ed to get ports on the right > track. I have done several exp-runs on the current src and we still have = a lot of fallouts. We > would like to ask you to have a look [1] at the failed ports and help to = fix them. We will start this week > an i386 exp-run to see how the status is. >=20 > Thanks for your time. >=20 > - Martin on behalf of portmgr >=20 > [1]http://pointyhat-west.isc.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-10-exp-latest/ Didn't a sort of consensus when switching to clang for base was discussed, was that ports would start use a port-provided version of gcc ? The adoption of the ports gcc was stalled due to the unability to make exp-runs, AFAIK. What you are proposing is de-facto forking the whole open-source code base. This cannot work, and in fact steals the FreeBSD resources for something which has absolutely no relevance for FreeBSD project. Ports should not be forced to use clang, either a ports gcc work should be finished, or cc in HEAD switched back to gcc. This is de-facto blocker for the 10.0. --coMTZEyEfmE1nMIA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRt3jTAAoJEJDCuSvBvK1BLpMQAKRSGF62u7NN5LnkMn2g80ig /m3cBanj3cV0473kOPEo7GzVSapqNVDjHxbX3bJ375Ow0VEYE0S23BM9BOA0NzoY VHkZJuQuAzvpPdlZHDwQVBR/TTd0s3z0dzOHon3F4Gwv36GKmDLlQpdl6MG7zv12 sTk1i9XgGL4RQqItrC2kkfKbgy8WIcwA0ZXgmHa2ua+PiiQEo+bDuXO7yISUWfS4 NWTXVxXp053Dyw0QzhIwTon+GqOh3aU0X8MVsao1kdYQrCmpTfvnuiClwsO0eCC2 SigJVEq/h96Ki8TIT7bDTyqtiuVas6Rx899kjrA+r1ZYFvrbctH624pvOIfguUMi fUd7QGKUXMrRcI/Da3kY1SreeG2+NYb4HRsHbuowAOxAqwYI3jfAvboKurSsSIPP CtUTITkfut7nhHkf3k9Qqznl3CUDaahhVDrZ10DFmUAIwnaNScn5l++HAxGnwZCQ 7nfmABJE1awN/CjqcOMq9kJuvc6lLwKuW/MHOhS3SvkHtYVpm3Nlr9cxzsMxwb1Q n/1sPtKjvqhKwPHefjlJ8cvZ8QoY2o1vvwmdduOBFJJ5lTR3Y9bpKsZEDaC13l2W +VHKFzqRA7MPcAUMyCZLVlHYW8HNt52WxJBJkLNgau0mUS9cg/mvNNglye3VnbJF 76crLeNE0uecrlyl+wjy =b8gE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --coMTZEyEfmE1nMIA--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130611192156.GU3047>