Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 4 Jul 2013 17:13:52 +0200
From:      Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>
To:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>
Subject:   Re: boot from ZFS: which pool types use?
Message-ID:  <20130704151352.GC43809@roberto02-aw.erc.corp.eurocontrol.int>
In-Reply-To: <51D56C19.8080103@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307041424030.2446@woozle.rinet.ru> <51D56066.1020902@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307041552031.2446@woozle.rinet.ru> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307041559160.2446@woozle.rinet.ru> <51D56C19.8080103@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to Andriy Gapon on Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 03:35:37PM +0300:
> Setting bootfs should not be required.  If your root filesystem is your root
> dataset (like "tank"), then everything should have just worked.

Except that it is a better idea to have a dataset separated from the root of the pool in order to be able to switch from one to another when upgrading, right?

-- 
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.net
In memoriam to Ondine, our 2nd child: http://ondine.keltia.net/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130704151352.GC43809>