Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 18:33:50 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base Message-ID: <20131008013350.GB31261@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <525354C2.8070807@m5p.com> References: <CAF6rxgkmfMmOqz1%2BbaG1_REkUVtX8COcukcPg%2BkVtcOQ9L023A@mail.gmail.com> <20131007150658.GA79233@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <52534B5E.7010401@freebsd.org> <20131008002854.GB56872@funkthat.com> <525354C2.8070807@m5p.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 08:41:38PM -0400, George Mitchell wrote: > On 10/07/13 20:28, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > Julian Elischer wrote this message on Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:01 +0800: > >> not a big thing but I believe that a lot of poeple use ci/co on /etc > >> becasue it is "just there" > > > > +1 > > > Folks, this is just plain a major violation of the Principle of Least > Amazement. RCS is ideal for keeping track of my configuration files > in /etc. What do we gain by removing it? Less GPL code in FreeBSD? -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131008013350.GB31261>