Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:10:45 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: perl@FreeBSD.org Subject: With or without .packlist? Message-ID: <20131010061045.GP16964@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--b5sSX5qSQrSInIHt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi guys, With the staging support, we can properly decide what we do pack or not inside the packages, the question now is do we keep the .packlist (in that case they need to be fixed because they are full of stage path :)) or should we just drop those files and no package them at all. It seems to me that most of the other operating systems are not packaging. I have no clue what what those .packlist files are useful for, so I do have no opinion, would be nice to get a perl@ claim on this soon, as we either need to fix them or nuke them. btw: sunpoet has a PR I'm sitting one because of that: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/182806 regards, Bapt --b5sSX5qSQrSInIHt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlJWROUACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EygvACgjL3dK2dWRfArpxL5dQ/EmRK2 VZEAn2soebpWkdswSf2UEnA1CcUkh3LC =nbdq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --b5sSX5qSQrSInIHt--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131010061045.GP16964>