Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 22:36:12 +0100 (CET) From: sthaug@nethelp.no To: gcr+freebsd-stable@tharned.org Cc: rkoberman@gmail.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND chroot environment in 10-RELEASE...gone? Message-ID: <20131203.223612.74719903.sthaug@nethelp.no> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1312031407090.78399@roadkill.tharned.org> References: <1386086749.9599.54995173.6CD35E54@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CAN6yY1sVGiQFNkoi0mGZs7grJ5SMAui-rDO1e8UDAs0PTUVL9g@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1312031407090.78399@roadkill.tharned.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > It was a deliberate decision made by the maintainer. He said the chroot > > code in the installation was too complicated and would be removed as a > > part of the installation clean-up to get all BIND related files out of > > /usr and /etc. I protested at the time as did someone else, but the > > maintainer did not respond. I thnk this was a really, really bad > > decision. > > > > I searched a bit for the thread on removing BIND leftovers, but have > > failed to find it. > > > > You're probably thinking about my November 17 posting: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2013-November/075895.html > > I'm glad to see others finally speaking up; I was beginning to think I was > the only one who thought this was not a good idea. I'm a bit surprised > that no one has responded yet. I agree with the protesters here. Removing chroot and symlinking logic in the ports is a significant disservice to FreeBSD users, and will make it harder to use BIND in a sensible way. A net disincentive to use FreeBSD :-( Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131203.223612.74719903.sthaug>