Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 22:04:27 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn && ports, or the hen && egg Message-ID: <20131218210427.GX99753@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20131218205026.GA1442@tiny-r255948> References: <20131218205026.GA1442@tiny-r255948>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 09:50:27PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > Hi, > > As ports are now for some time are to be pulled out via SVN (and not > CVS) and the svn client is only in the ports tree and not in the base > system, how is this thought to work in a clean way, without dusting the > system before with some binary packages, only based on base system and > sources? > > Thanks > > matthias > -- > Sent from my FreeBSD netbook > > Matthias Apitz, <guru@unixarea.de>, http://www.unixarea.de/ f: +49-170-4527211 > UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) > UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2, FreeBSD since 2.2.5 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" First svn is in base named svnlite since 10, then the recommanded way to get the ports tree is to use portsnap which is also in base. regards, Bapt [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlKyDdsACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzO6QCfaeFCadzVwg5UsFQquopSzoyY IagAn2/fKJa83Ajf1S+yxP2GBTue8YCh =IfdN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131218210427.GX99753>